The AI 2.0 narrative presents meaningful structural shifts compared to its predecessor. The key difference lies in focus: where AI 1.0 centered on general large language models and broad adoption, AI 2.0 emphasizes specialized applications, on-chain intelligence, and autonomous agents operating within decentralized ecosystems. This iteration also diverges in execution—rather than enterprise-dependent deployment, we're seeing permissionless, community-driven development gaining traction. The market structure reflects this too: earlier cycles were dominated by megacap plays, while current momentum shows fragmentation across sector-specific AI tokens and infrastructure. For crypto markets specifically, the distinction matters significantly—it reshapes which projects capture value and how investor allocation flows. Understanding these architectural changes helps identify which narratives have genuine staying power versus hype cycles.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetective
· 11h ago
On-chain intelligence is the true way out; the megacap strategies are outdated.
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMiner
· 11h ago
AI 2.0 is about breaking down the big picture even further. Those who previously all-in on GPT now need to shift to on-chain intelligent agents. This wave truly changes the landscape.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 11h ago
On-chain intelligent agents are really different; it feels like the previous wave of large models was just white noise.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 11h ago
AI 2.0 is like breaking the cake into pieces; the era of megacap is over. Now, it's about who can come up with creative tricks on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 11h ago
AI 2.0 is really a shift from Bitcoin to niche tracks. It sounds exciting, but after looking into it for a while, I still don't know which project will survive until next year haha.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagic
· 11h ago
Fragmentation is the real thing; the megacap approach is already outdated.
The AI 2.0 narrative presents meaningful structural shifts compared to its predecessor. The key difference lies in focus: where AI 1.0 centered on general large language models and broad adoption, AI 2.0 emphasizes specialized applications, on-chain intelligence, and autonomous agents operating within decentralized ecosystems. This iteration also diverges in execution—rather than enterprise-dependent deployment, we're seeing permissionless, community-driven development gaining traction. The market structure reflects this too: earlier cycles were dominated by megacap plays, while current momentum shows fragmentation across sector-specific AI tokens and infrastructure. For crypto markets specifically, the distinction matters significantly—it reshapes which projects capture value and how investor allocation flows. Understanding these architectural changes helps identify which narratives have genuine staying power versus hype cycles.