The cycle keeps repeating itself in this market. SPX launched with grand promises, then came SPLASH with a fresh narrative, now we're seeing DHX follow the same blueprint. Same pattern, different branding.
It's worth observing: these projects tend to follow an identical trajectory—hype buildup, token distribution, value concentration toward early stakeholders. The mechanics rarely change, just the ticker symbol does.
If you're tracking these launches, the question becomes harder to ignore: are we looking at genuine innovation or just repackaged value extraction with new market conditions? The data suggests many traders have already made their choice by staying on the sidelines.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashRatePhilosopher
· 8h ago
Same old trick again, changing the name to keep scamming?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 8h ago
I'm too familiar with this routine; I've seen through it in the mempool long ago. SPX→SPLASH→DHX, the token distribution logic is exactly the same, just a cash machine for early holders.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 8h ago
Same old trick, just a different coat of paint. Early investors made a killing, later entrants just took over the leftovers...
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just a change of packaging without changing the medicine. How many rounds has this trick been played?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 8h ago
Another one? Changing the name but still the same old trick.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again, just changing the coin name to keep scamming new investors.
The cycle keeps repeating itself in this market. SPX launched with grand promises, then came SPLASH with a fresh narrative, now we're seeing DHX follow the same blueprint. Same pattern, different branding.
It's worth observing: these projects tend to follow an identical trajectory—hype buildup, token distribution, value concentration toward early stakeholders. The mechanics rarely change, just the ticker symbol does.
If you're tracking these launches, the question becomes harder to ignore: are we looking at genuine innovation or just repackaged value extraction with new market conditions? The data suggests many traders have already made their choice by staying on the sidelines.