What is the real bottleneck in the implementation of AI? It's not a lack of computing power, nor is it that the models are not smart enough, but rather the absence of an accountability mechanism.
When enterprises and institutions deploy automation systems, they must be able to clearly track—who made what decision, when, and based on what permissions. This is especially important for finance, healthcare, and government sectors.
$RENDER is advancing AI computing infrastructure, and $NEAR makes AI applications easier to deploy, but all of these require a foundational trust layer. That’s why autonomous identity frameworks are so critical. Through a verifiable credential system, every step of AI’s operation can be traced back to a real entity and specific permissions.
The same identity layer has already proven effective in cross-border trade and public services, and now it can be directly used to authenticate AI-driven decision-making processes. This is the key for AI to move from proof of concept to real production applications—not faster models, but verifiable chains of responsibility. This is both the problem and the solution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmi
· 6h ago
Hmm... That's quite interesting. The accountability mechanism has indeed been neglected for too long.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 6h ago
Well said. The accountability mechanism is indeed the part that has been seriously underestimated. However, it seems that most projects are still competing over computing power and parameters, while very few are genuinely working on identity verification.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 6h ago
Exactly right, accountability mechanisms are truly the key.
Really, right now many projects hype up computing power and models; anyone can run a transformer, but what happens when issues arise? No one takes responsibility... I buy into this authentication logic, especially in finance, where one wrong decision can involve too many interests.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 6h ago
Accountability chains are the real necessity; discussions about computing power are outdated topics.
What is the real bottleneck in the implementation of AI? It's not a lack of computing power, nor is it that the models are not smart enough, but rather the absence of an accountability mechanism.
When enterprises and institutions deploy automation systems, they must be able to clearly track—who made what decision, when, and based on what permissions. This is especially important for finance, healthcare, and government sectors.
$RENDER is advancing AI computing infrastructure, and $NEAR makes AI applications easier to deploy, but all of these require a foundational trust layer. That’s why autonomous identity frameworks are so critical. Through a verifiable credential system, every step of AI’s operation can be traced back to a real entity and specific permissions.
The same identity layer has already proven effective in cross-border trade and public services, and now it can be directly used to authenticate AI-driven decision-making processes. This is the key for AI to move from proof of concept to real production applications—not faster models, but verifiable chains of responsibility. This is both the problem and the solution.