Content ecology needs to return to its original intention, rather than being hijacked by data.
There's a very insightful saying—"Creating solely for data is unsustainable; good data should be a natural reward for high-quality content, not an intentionally pursued goal."
This is the principle that a certain leading content platform坚持. The editors stay up late polishing every word, and in an era where AI-generated content floods the market, there are still people willing to be meticulous word by word. Does this坚持 still have meaning? The answer is quite simple—when most people are taking shortcuts, seriousness becomes a rare commodity. Readers can feel the difference, and the community can too. Those accumulated contents will ultimately speak for themselves.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
mev_me_maybe
· 4h ago
Tsk, it's that same argument of "being diligent is a rare quality"... But to be honest, platforms that still insist on handcrafted polishing are truly few and far between nowadays.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 4h ago
ngl this is giving "quality over quantity" vibes but like... does anyone actually have the attention span for that anymore? ser we're all just aping into whatever has the best engagement metrics tbh. probably nothing tho
Reply0
MEVHunterX
· 4h ago
Really, the current flood of AI-generated garbage makes the people who put effort into creating content stand out even more.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 4h ago
actually... this whole "data as natural byproduct" framing? it's kinda masking the real trust assumption issue here. like, who's defining what "quality" even is? the algorithm or the reader?
Reply0
AirdropHunter007
· 4h ago
Hey, you're right. Now it's all about data above everything else, which ends up ruining the content itself. Feeling a bit tired.
Content ecology needs to return to its original intention, rather than being hijacked by data.
There's a very insightful saying—"Creating solely for data is unsustainable; good data should be a natural reward for high-quality content, not an intentionally pursued goal."
This is the principle that a certain leading content platform坚持. The editors stay up late polishing every word, and in an era where AI-generated content floods the market, there are still people willing to be meticulous word by word. Does this坚持 still have meaning? The answer is quite simple—when most people are taking shortcuts, seriousness becomes a rare commodity. Readers can feel the difference, and the community can too. Those accumulated contents will ultimately speak for themselves.