Imagine this: your assets are on different chains, but you have to pay different gas fees for each jump. This isn't Web3; it's a currency exchange game.
The reality is in front of us—cross-chain transfer technology has long been mature. What really bottlenecks us? It's these various gas mechanisms. Ethereum's gas, Polygon's gas, Arbitrum's gas... user experience is falling apart.
One idea worth paying attention to: what if there was a unified gas layer that could seamlessly coordinate across multiple chains? No need to calculate gas parameters for each chain, no more worrying about which chain to choose to "save gas"—just make gas a backend logic, so users don't even feel its presence.
This is what the future multichain world should look like. Moving from fragmentation to integration, only then can user experience truly be upgraded.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainDetective
· 3h ago
According to on-chain data, this "Unified Gas Layer"方案 has been attempted before, but why has it never been truly implemented? I have a guess — it inevitably involves a redistribution of interests among various chains, which is quite obvious.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 16h ago
Basically, the cross-chain experience right now is like a fool's game. Every time, I have to study the gas fee table, afraid of getting ripped off.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 16h ago
NGL, the gas fee system is really outrageous. You have to recalculate it for each chain, it's so annoying.
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 16h ago
Gas fees are truly amazing; each chain has a different "tax rate," and users need to act as accountants just for transfers.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 16h ago
Gas fees really need to be regulated; we're being exploited every day.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSage
· 16h ago
Once again, the gas fee issue is really unbelievable. Switching chains is like gambling.
View OriginalReply0
DegenGambler
· 16h ago
Gas fees are so mysterious; it's better to just go all-in on one chain.
Imagine this: your assets are on different chains, but you have to pay different gas fees for each jump. This isn't Web3; it's a currency exchange game.
The reality is in front of us—cross-chain transfer technology has long been mature. What really bottlenecks us? It's these various gas mechanisms. Ethereum's gas, Polygon's gas, Arbitrum's gas... user experience is falling apart.
One idea worth paying attention to: what if there was a unified gas layer that could seamlessly coordinate across multiple chains? No need to calculate gas parameters for each chain, no more worrying about which chain to choose to "save gas"—just make gas a backend logic, so users don't even feel its presence.
This is what the future multichain world should look like. Moving from fragmentation to integration, only then can user experience truly be upgraded.