Initially, I was attracted to this project for a few reasons: the product was indeed polished and ran smoothly on the testnet; the community engagement was quite strong, with obvious growth momentum; and the area they focused on was also my area of interest—the on-chain collectibles ecosystem.
But over time, some of the project's decisions started to seem strange. It's not a technical issue with the product, but rather strategic choices and community management. Every new move made me feel their direction was becoming more ambiguous. Honestly, some of the key decisions have diverged from my initial judgment of the project.
This made me rethink—supporting a project isn't just about technology and early performance, but also about how they make decisions at critical moments. When the founder's ideas and community expectations start to diverge, that initial glow diminishes. In the end, I decided to withdraw my support because I believe that trust is more important than the product itself.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 15h ago
Really, the feeling of a failed project is the most uncomfortable... The technical aspects in the early stages were indeed solid, and the community enthusiasm was there, but the strategic level was a complete mess. The founder's ideas don't align with us players at all.
Once trust is broken, it's very hard to put it back together. This guy is right.
The project team really needs to reflect and reconsider. Not all HODLers can stick around and ride with you forever.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropGrandpa
· 15h ago
Honestly, looking at the founder is more important than looking at the code. I truly understand this point.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 15h ago
Early on, everyone was optimistic about this, but technical skills alone don't matter. The key is still how the team operates.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 15h ago
Honestly, it's really upsetting to see the project gradually come to a halt. Once the original intention is lost, it can't be regained.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 15h ago
Really, the biggest fear when you believe in a project is that the founders start to self-doubt... and change their stance for various reasons.
Why was the project I supported later untagged?
Initially, I was attracted to this project for a few reasons: the product was indeed polished and ran smoothly on the testnet; the community engagement was quite strong, with obvious growth momentum; and the area they focused on was also my area of interest—the on-chain collectibles ecosystem.
But over time, some of the project's decisions started to seem strange. It's not a technical issue with the product, but rather strategic choices and community management. Every new move made me feel their direction was becoming more ambiguous. Honestly, some of the key decisions have diverged from my initial judgment of the project.
This made me rethink—supporting a project isn't just about technology and early performance, but also about how they make decisions at critical moments. When the founder's ideas and community expectations start to diverge, that initial glow diminishes. In the end, I decided to withdraw my support because I believe that trust is more important than the product itself.