2026-01-17 20:23:28

The GAS token in the Solana ecosystem is currently facing the most severe selling pressure. According to on-chain data, creator fees have accumulated to $266,768. This raises a core question: if the Bags App and Finnbags project teams truly believe in their products, should they consider implementing a fee locking mechanism? The fee locking scheme can better constrain creator behavior and incentivize long-term development rather than short-term cashing out. This mechanism design is crucial for maintaining a healthy project ecosystem—especially in a high selling pressure environment, where reasonable profit distribution and aligned incentives are the foundation for sustainable development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PerpetualLonger

· 01-17 20:53

With such strong selling pressure, why not add to your position quickly? This is the last chance to catch the bottom; stay confident, brother. The bears are dumping, but locking in costs can actually support the market. This shows the product team's determination. Still afraid of 260,000 USD? It's the same in a bear market; recovering costs requires faith. I'm really puzzled—if you're truly optimistic, why not go all in and support it strongly? This is the time to filter for believers. Retail investors are still selling, while we are catching the bottom.

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-17 20:53

The cost has accumulated to 260,000 dollars, and this flower is starting to wither... Projects that truly believe in their products, why are they still hesitating about whether to lock content for creators?

View OriginalReply0

HorizonHunter

· 01-17 20:52

To be honest, just looking at these numbers is a bit troublesome. The locking mechanism sounds good, but there are only a few projects that can actually implement it.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-17 20:27

It's the same old story of the locking mechanism. To put it nicely, it's long-term incentives; to be blunt, it's just fear of dumping.

View OriginalReply0