You often hear in the market that large fund accounts rarely suffer huge losses, while small retail investors are easily wiped out. In fact, the key difference lies in the tolerance for errors— their operational logic is completely different.
Large funds never go all-in; instead, they build positions gradually and manage them in layers. Even if a single position incurs a loss, because the overall portfolio is diversified, the loss only affects a part of the holdings and has limited impact on the overall account. They usually divide their funds into multiple cycles and position at different price levels. This way, a single pullback cannot shake the overall situation.
The situation for small funds is quite the opposite—they often go all-in at once. If they are confident in a certain direction, they go full position, but if the market then pulls back 15%, they get caught completely. There’s no buffer space, no chance to readjust, and they get locked in, unable to move.
In simple terms, this reflects the ability of capital management. Large funds have the capital to tolerate errors; small funds can only gamble once. Understanding this difference helps explain why some can still thrive in a bear market, while others can lose everything even in a bull market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainArchaeologist
· 01-18 04:01
That's the gap. The moment you go all-in, you've already lost.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Seven
· 01-18 03:54
That's right, going all in is really a retail investor suicide move. I've seen too many people go all-in at once and then disappear.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-18 03:52
I was just saying, although this statement is correct, it's not thorough enough. A 15% correction is just the beginning? That indicates a lack of proper technical analysis. From my quantitative model, the real institutional players are also gambling, but they are just betting on probabilities.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 01-18 03:36
It's the same old story... I believe in large funds building positions gradually, but claiming that retail investors can only go all-in is going too far. Clearly, no one is teaching them.
You often hear in the market that large fund accounts rarely suffer huge losses, while small retail investors are easily wiped out. In fact, the key difference lies in the tolerance for errors— their operational logic is completely different.
Large funds never go all-in; instead, they build positions gradually and manage them in layers. Even if a single position incurs a loss, because the overall portfolio is diversified, the loss only affects a part of the holdings and has limited impact on the overall account. They usually divide their funds into multiple cycles and position at different price levels. This way, a single pullback cannot shake the overall situation.
The situation for small funds is quite the opposite—they often go all-in at once. If they are confident in a certain direction, they go full position, but if the market then pulls back 15%, they get caught completely. There’s no buffer space, no chance to readjust, and they get locked in, unable to move.
In simple terms, this reflects the ability of capital management. Large funds have the capital to tolerate errors; small funds can only gamble once. Understanding this difference helps explain why some can still thrive in a bear market, while others can lose everything even in a bull market.