Recently, I have been researching storage solutions within the Sui ecosystem and found this combination approach quite interesting. Sui itself excels at processing transactions quickly, while Walrus Protocol focuses on stable data storage—one emphasizes speed, the other guarantees capacity, forming a complementary pair.

In Walrus's economic design, staking and governance mechanisms tightly connect storage service providers, ensuring the network can operate stably. This is not just simple incentives but truly aligns participants' interests with the long-term operation of the system.

From a technical perspective, the blob storage combined with erasure coding is a very practical solution. Files are split and distributed across multiple nodes; even if some nodes go offline, the system can recover the complete data through erasure coding. The benefits of this approach are obvious: data security is guaranteed, censorship resistance is strong, and the network's risk resistance is also enhanced.

To be honest, my view on such projects goes beyond just price fluctuations. The key is whether this economic model can truly support the long-term operation of the network and meet actual storage needs. For decentralized storage networks to succeed, they must solve incentives and reliability issues. Walrus's approach in this regard is worth paying attention to.

In summary: Sui improves transaction efficiency, Walrus handles data storage, and with a reasonable economic design, the entire decentralized stack can truly be put into operation.