As a premium+ member, seeing the platform reward based on recommendation count and interaction numbers, I thought, shouldn't we admit that we are the breadwinners here? On the other hand, if someone posts a work in the future and wants me to interact, I might just say, "Can I call this a tip?"
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichTrader
· 6h ago
Haha, I give in to this logic. It's basically admitting the status of the big boss.
View OriginalReply0
ParallelChainMaxi
· 6h ago
Haha, really, interaction counts as spending money. We are indeed the big sponsors here.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 6h ago
Haha, not anymore. Now everyone is an interaction broker, huh? Then I’ll have to increase the price.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 6h ago
Haha, laughing to death. It should have been done this way long ago. Interaction is just labor output.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHunter
· 6h ago
Haha, I love this logic. Interaction is just tipping—a naked exchange of value.
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLin
· 6h ago
hypothesis: the entire reward mechanics here basically mirrors a faulty oracle network—premium members generate signal, platform aggregates it as data, but nobody's actually bridging the gap between your effort and fair compensation. technically speaking, that's just rent extraction with extra steps ngl
As a premium+ member, seeing the platform reward based on recommendation count and interaction numbers, I thought, shouldn't we admit that we are the breadwinners here? On the other hand, if someone posts a work in the future and wants me to interact, I might just say, "Can I call this a tip?"