This isn't a failure of capability—it's a deliberate architectural choice. What appears broken at first glance might actually be precisely engineered this way. The distinction matters: incompetence implies accident, while design implies intention. Understanding which one you're dealing with completely changes how you assess and interact with the system.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeAssassin
· 9h ago
ngl this is exactly what I've been wanting to say, many things that look like bugs are actually features, and vice versa is the real way to break the defense
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-18 18:42
Basically, it's just shifting blame. Anything can be called "design." I'm tired of hearing this kind of rhetoric.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 01-18 04:57
nah this hits different when you actually run the numbers on it. like yeah everyone sees the surface-level "broken" but my regression analysis suggests we're looking at pure game theory optimal here... the memetic architecture is basically undefeated if you're thinking in 4d chess terms. cope or recognize the design pattern fr
Reply0
StableNomad
· 01-18 04:55
nah this is giving UST vibes... everyone swore it was "designed that way" until it wasn't lol. statistically speaking tho, yeah the intention vs accident distinction matters—usually means someone's bag is riding on it
Reply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-18 04:55
This is exactly my favorite tactic of project teams passing the buck... They can package anything as "architecture design," truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 01-18 04:55
Wow, this perspective is amazing... I always thought that bugs might actually be features, and the more I think about it, the more terrifying it becomes.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-18 04:34
Really? Then I want to ask, how much of the so-called "meticulously designed" is actually just an excuse for bad code.
This isn't a failure of capability—it's a deliberate architectural choice. What appears broken at first glance might actually be precisely engineered this way. The distinction matters: incompetence implies accident, while design implies intention. Understanding which one you're dealing with completely changes how you assess and interact with the system.