Building a prediction market copy trading strategy, $200 → $52 lessons learned
I developed a bot that tracks whale trades on Polymarket. Paper Trading simulated over 5000 trades, with a 58% win rate and a profit of +$770. Confidently, I put in real money of $200.
Result: 25 real trades, with a 28% win rate, remaining $52.
Pitfalls encountered:
1. Phantom Decisions - The code recorded "I want to buy," but API errors prevented the trade from executing. The database stored a bunch of decision records, but the account balance remained unchanged. Self-deceptive data = false confidence.
2. Repeated Orders - Whales bought the same market 5 times in a row, and the bot followed with 5 purchases. Single market exposure reached 40%, a single loss would cause a blow-up.
3. Position Limits Are Virtually Useless - Configured with a 5% cap, but each order actually took up 40%. Risk control code was bypassed but went unnoticed (because it wasn’t tested).
4. The Illusion of Paper Trading - Simulated without slippage or latency; signal price = execution price. In real environments, it takes seconds for signals to execute, and prices have already moved.
5. Whale Traders in Sports Markets Are Gamblers - NHL trades lost $80 per trade, NBA trades all lost in 5 attempts. Not all whales are smart money; sports betting whales might just be wealthy gamblers.
Lessons to learn: average entry price controlled within 0.5-0.6 range (not chasing high odds), 5000 trades to diversify risk. But this edge is too thin; friction costs in real environments eat up all profits.
Lesson: simulated profits ≠ real profits. $80 tuition fees.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Building a prediction market copy trading strategy, $200 → $52 lessons learned
I developed a bot that tracks whale trades on Polymarket. Paper Trading simulated over 5000 trades, with a 58% win rate and a profit of +$770. Confidently, I put in real money of $200.
Result: 25 real trades, with a 28% win rate, remaining $52.
Pitfalls encountered:
1. Phantom Decisions - The code recorded "I want to buy," but API errors prevented the trade from executing. The database stored a bunch of decision records, but the account balance remained unchanged. Self-deceptive data = false confidence.
2. Repeated Orders - Whales bought the same market 5 times in a row, and the bot followed with 5 purchases. Single market exposure reached 40%, a single loss would cause a blow-up.
3. Position Limits Are Virtually Useless - Configured with a 5% cap, but each order actually took up 40%. Risk control code was bypassed but went unnoticed (because it wasn’t tested).
4. The Illusion of Paper Trading - Simulated without slippage or latency; signal price = execution price. In real environments, it takes seconds for signals to execute, and prices have already moved.
5. Whale Traders in Sports Markets Are Gamblers - NHL trades lost $80 per trade, NBA trades all lost in 5 attempts. Not all whales are smart money; sports betting whales might just be wealthy gamblers.
Lessons to learn: average entry price controlled within 0.5-0.6 range (not chasing high odds), 5000 trades to diversify risk. But this edge is too thin; friction costs in real environments eat up all profits.
Lesson: simulated profits ≠ real profits. $80 tuition fees.