A 16x P/E valuation combined with an almost monopolistic market position is indeed a bit outrageous. Deep holders like DaBao have long seen through the value—when the competitive landscape has already taken shape and scarcity is evident, being cheap is the hard truth. The market always votes with its feet, but sometimes it takes time to verify the vision of those who truly understand the industry.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
governance_lurkervip
· 5h ago
A 16x P/E ratio is indeed a bit inflated, but with the monopoly structure in place, those who entered early are already making a fortune.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 5h ago
16x P/E? DaBao really has a lot of patience; I can't wait that long.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 5h ago
16x P/E? Under a monopoly structure, it should have been more expensive long ago. This wave was indeed undervalued.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 5h ago
16x PE? Laughable, this is just waiting to be proven wrong. DaBao doesn't know anything, and those following the trend are all at a loss. Cheap ≠ profitable; it depends on who is taking the risk. I've heard the phrase "monopoly position" too many times, but what’s the result? Market voting still needs time to verify, which means there's no confidence. Buying early and selling late is better; this time I choose to wait and see. The scarcity has been overhyped; the truly valuable ones are in the hands of big V influencers. The prices are indeed outrageous, but who dares to take this position? Watching DaBao lose money is quite amusing, sorry to say it like that.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)