Optimism DAO, which drives the Optimism project, is currently facing a major decision. A vote is currently underway on a proposal to use 50% of the monthly revenue generated from Superchain to conduct a share buyback of OP tokens. The plan is highly divided within the community and is an important choice that will shape the project’s future management policy.
Content and Background of the Monthly Buyback Proposal
The specific content of the proposal is to allocate half of Superchain’s monthly revenue to buy back OP tokens. According to an analysis platform NS3.AI, this proposal has been hotly debated among representatives of Optimism DAO.
OP’s current price is $0.27 (data update: January 30, 2026), indicating a proposition amidst active market trading. This measure demonstrates a strategy to increase the value of the project through token buying support from the market.
Axis of Confrontation between Proponents and Opponents
There are multiple views on the proposal. Proponents argue that regular token buybacks are an effective means of stabilizing and enhancing OP’s price. It is evaluated as a value-creating move for token holders.
On the other hand, opponents express different concerns. It points out that the large use of DAO funds may reduce the overall financial flexibility of the project and weaken its ability to respond to unforeseen events. Additionally, there is a risk of market manipulation due to continuous OP buying on a monthly basis, as well as concerns about improper execution.
Execution Challenges and Market Spillover
If this buyback plan is actually adopted, it is expected to have a tangible impact on the market. The monthly heavy buying support may affect OP’s price formation in the short term. At the same time, transparency and accountability in DAOs’ fund allocation strategies will also be questioned.
It is an important turning point in how the Optimism community’s voting results will show how the project has a management attitude and its relationship with the market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Optimism DAO's OP buyback strategy stirs up waves in the market, and discussions heat up
Optimism DAO, which drives the Optimism project, is currently facing a major decision. A vote is currently underway on a proposal to use 50% of the monthly revenue generated from Superchain to conduct a share buyback of OP tokens. The plan is highly divided within the community and is an important choice that will shape the project’s future management policy.
Content and Background of the Monthly Buyback Proposal
The specific content of the proposal is to allocate half of Superchain’s monthly revenue to buy back OP tokens. According to an analysis platform NS3.AI, this proposal has been hotly debated among representatives of Optimism DAO.
OP’s current price is $0.27 (data update: January 30, 2026), indicating a proposition amidst active market trading. This measure demonstrates a strategy to increase the value of the project through token buying support from the market.
Axis of Confrontation between Proponents and Opponents
There are multiple views on the proposal. Proponents argue that regular token buybacks are an effective means of stabilizing and enhancing OP’s price. It is evaluated as a value-creating move for token holders.
On the other hand, opponents express different concerns. It points out that the large use of DAO funds may reduce the overall financial flexibility of the project and weaken its ability to respond to unforeseen events. Additionally, there is a risk of market manipulation due to continuous OP buying on a monthly basis, as well as concerns about improper execution.
Execution Challenges and Market Spillover
If this buyback plan is actually adopted, it is expected to have a tangible impact on the market. The monthly heavy buying support may affect OP’s price formation in the short term. At the same time, transparency and accountability in DAOs’ fund allocation strategies will also be questioned.
It is an important turning point in how the Optimism community’s voting results will show how the project has a management attitude and its relationship with the market.