Recently, the Korean government officially launched the most comprehensive artificial intelligence regulatory legal system in the country to date, which is also regarded by the industry as the world’s first comprehensive AI basic law. This legal framework aims to establish clear rules for the rapidly developing AI industry while protecting consumer rights and maintaining the sustainability of technological innovation.
“Korean Solution” in the Global AI Governance Landscape
Korea’s move occupies a unique position in the global wave of AI regulation. In contrast, the EU’s AI Act will be implemented in phases starting in 2027, and the United States has adopted a relatively lenient regulatory stance to give tech companies more room for innovation. Korea has chosen a more proactive and stringent approach, reflecting its ambition in the global AI competition.
Strict Penalties and Tiered Fine System
The most notable aspect of Korea’s new law is its strict penalty provisions. According to relevant regulations, companies that fail to properly label generative AI will face fines of up to 30 times 1 million Korean won, approximately $20,400. This tiered penalty system (with the basic unit being 1 million Korean won) is designed to impose appropriate restrictions on violations of different scales.
Transition Period and Compliance Challenges for Companies
It is worth noting that relevant authorities will grant companies at least a one-year transition period, during which non-compliant companies will not be subject to immediate administrative fines. This arrangement provides a buffer for companies to adjust operational processes and establish compliance systems.
However, a senior researcher from the Korea Startup Alliance pointed out potential issues. He stated that the vague or imprecise wording in the legal provisions might lead companies to adopt overly cautious “safest solutions” to mitigate regulatory risks, and such conservative practices could hinder genuine innovation activities. This reflects the difficult balance between establishing strict regulatory frameworks and encouraging technological progress.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
South Korea's AI regulation law officially launched, and corporate compliance costs are expected to rise significantly
Recently, the Korean government officially launched the most comprehensive artificial intelligence regulatory legal system in the country to date, which is also regarded by the industry as the world’s first comprehensive AI basic law. This legal framework aims to establish clear rules for the rapidly developing AI industry while protecting consumer rights and maintaining the sustainability of technological innovation.
“Korean Solution” in the Global AI Governance Landscape
Korea’s move occupies a unique position in the global wave of AI regulation. In contrast, the EU’s AI Act will be implemented in phases starting in 2027, and the United States has adopted a relatively lenient regulatory stance to give tech companies more room for innovation. Korea has chosen a more proactive and stringent approach, reflecting its ambition in the global AI competition.
Strict Penalties and Tiered Fine System
The most notable aspect of Korea’s new law is its strict penalty provisions. According to relevant regulations, companies that fail to properly label generative AI will face fines of up to 30 times 1 million Korean won, approximately $20,400. This tiered penalty system (with the basic unit being 1 million Korean won) is designed to impose appropriate restrictions on violations of different scales.
Transition Period and Compliance Challenges for Companies
It is worth noting that relevant authorities will grant companies at least a one-year transition period, during which non-compliant companies will not be subject to immediate administrative fines. This arrangement provides a buffer for companies to adjust operational processes and establish compliance systems.
However, a senior researcher from the Korea Startup Alliance pointed out potential issues. He stated that the vague or imprecise wording in the legal provisions might lead companies to adopt overly cautious “safest solutions” to mitigate regulatory risks, and such conservative practices could hinder genuine innovation activities. This reflects the difficult balance between establishing strict regulatory frameworks and encouraging technological progress.