Amid a market atmosphere driven by investors flocking to chase gains and retail investors boosting the trend, this week’s market performance fully demonstrated how quickly market confidence can evaporate.
As popular trading assets collectively weaken, trillions of dollars of capital rapidly shift in the market, leaving almost no room for error in highly concentrated positions.
The precious metals market is at the forefront. Gold experienced its most severe decline in decades, while silver’s drop hit a record low. Other popular strategies also showed instability—including bearish bets on the US dollar, bets on non-US stock markets, and enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI) concepts.
Although the volatility in precious metals was the core theme of the week, it conveyed a deeper signal: when trading strategies become market consensus, even minor changes can trigger unexpectedly intense shocks.
Market signs of crowding appeared even before the price plunge. A January survey of US fund managers by Bank of America showed that long gold was considered the most crowded trade globally. Persistent fervent demand once pushed gold prices above the long-term trend line by over 44%, with the premium reaching its highest level since 1980.
Keith Lerner, Chief Market Strategist at Truist Advisory Services, stated plainly: “Market consensus is always right—unless it goes to extremes.”
This week, the limits of that market consensus were put to the test.
On Friday, the US dollar index saw its largest single-day gain since May, severely impacting dollar bears; emerging market equities underperformed relative to US stocks, also marking their worst single-day performance since May. Market cracks had already appeared on Thursday morning—after gold and silver prices plummeted over 7% within 30 minutes, although they rebounded somewhat, the downward trend was set.
On Friday, President Trump nominated Kevin Woor to be the next Federal Reserve Chair, further accelerating market sell-offs. Although this appointment was not unexpected (Woor had been a market favorite for days), it hastened the shift in existing trends. Woor, a traditional hawk, recently shifted to a dovish stance on interest rate cuts, adding uncertainty to the Fed’s policy path and shaking market expectations of a clear dovish outcome. This uncertainty further boosted the dollar and weakened the “currency devaluation trade” that previously supported metals’ gains.
In normal market conditions, these factors combined might only cause a mild correction. But in today’s market, where investors’ positions are highly aligned and leverage levels are quietly accumulating—these factors alone are enough to trigger a sharp decline in a single day: gold plunged over 9%, and silver tumbled about 27%.
Emily Roland, Co-Chief Investment Strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments, said: “Any asset that rises in a parabolic manner often falls in a parabolic manner as well. The recent plunge in precious metals is largely driven by market momentum, technical trading, and sentiment.”
This one-way betting phenomenon is observable across various markets. Renaissance Macro Research, citing Consensus Inc., reports that the Silver Sentiment Index, based on weekly surveys of broker strategists and financial journalists, has soared to its highest level since 1998. By Friday, the dollar had experienced its worst start to a year in eight years, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index outperformed the S&P 500 by its widest margin since 2022.
This phenomenon serves as a reminder: even though the overall bull market remains resilient, investor positioning behind it has reached an extremely high level. The gold market crash this week also exposed other crowded trades—from small-cap stocks regaining favor to strategies betting on continued low market volatility and a steepening yield curve.
On Wednesday, Microsoft (MSFT.US) announced record AI-related spending, but its core cloud business growth slowed, reigniting concerns that large tech investments may take longer to translate into actual profits. The market responded swiftly, with Microsoft’s stock price falling sharply, prompting investors to reconsider the previously widespread assumption that “high spending will solidify US tech dominance.”
Last week, tensions between the US and Europe caused market turbulence, briefly interrupting the New Year rally, but assets quickly rebounded almost in unison.
This week, the S&P 500 ended a two-week losing streak, posting its first weekly gain in three weeks, and even briefly broke the 7,000-point threshold.
Behind the market noise, a more profound question is emerging: in this momentum-driven market, do contrarian investors still have a place? Before market consensus shifts, what are the costs of going against the trend?
Rich Weiss, Chief Investment Officer of Multi-Asset Strategies at American Century Investments, was among those who started contrarian positioning at the end of last year. His portfolio increased holdings in US stocks and reduced overseas assets, but with non-US assets soaring, this move has yet to pay off.
But he remains steadfast, believing that continued growth in corporate profits will help US companies outperform their overseas competitors.
Weiss said: “Although current market trends are contrary to our positioning, the fundamentals are moving in a direction favorable to us. Chasing market momentum is like picking up coins in front of a steamroller—seems feasible until a crisis hits.”
While Friday’s market volatility has not yet fully ended all popular trades, some investors are beginning to wonder: is this an early warning sign to exit?
Jeff Muhlenkamp has closely followed the rally in gold, with his $270 million fund returning nearly 10% this year. He said that although the recent plunge in gold is not good news, exiting too early now could mean missing out on years of potential gains if prices rebound later.
He added: “I have to ask myself right now: how much more can gold fall? I don’t have an answer yet.”
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Wall Street's hot trading collectively "crashes"! The 2026 market's first lesson for investors: How dangerous is overcrowded trading?
Amid a market atmosphere driven by investors flocking to chase gains and retail investors boosting the trend, this week’s market performance fully demonstrated how quickly market confidence can evaporate.
As popular trading assets collectively weaken, trillions of dollars of capital rapidly shift in the market, leaving almost no room for error in highly concentrated positions.
The precious metals market is at the forefront. Gold experienced its most severe decline in decades, while silver’s drop hit a record low. Other popular strategies also showed instability—including bearish bets on the US dollar, bets on non-US stock markets, and enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI) concepts.
Although the volatility in precious metals was the core theme of the week, it conveyed a deeper signal: when trading strategies become market consensus, even minor changes can trigger unexpectedly intense shocks.
Market signs of crowding appeared even before the price plunge. A January survey of US fund managers by Bank of America showed that long gold was considered the most crowded trade globally. Persistent fervent demand once pushed gold prices above the long-term trend line by over 44%, with the premium reaching its highest level since 1980.
Keith Lerner, Chief Market Strategist at Truist Advisory Services, stated plainly: “Market consensus is always right—unless it goes to extremes.”
This week, the limits of that market consensus were put to the test.
On Friday, the US dollar index saw its largest single-day gain since May, severely impacting dollar bears; emerging market equities underperformed relative to US stocks, also marking their worst single-day performance since May. Market cracks had already appeared on Thursday morning—after gold and silver prices plummeted over 7% within 30 minutes, although they rebounded somewhat, the downward trend was set.
On Friday, President Trump nominated Kevin Woor to be the next Federal Reserve Chair, further accelerating market sell-offs. Although this appointment was not unexpected (Woor had been a market favorite for days), it hastened the shift in existing trends. Woor, a traditional hawk, recently shifted to a dovish stance on interest rate cuts, adding uncertainty to the Fed’s policy path and shaking market expectations of a clear dovish outcome. This uncertainty further boosted the dollar and weakened the “currency devaluation trade” that previously supported metals’ gains.
In normal market conditions, these factors combined might only cause a mild correction. But in today’s market, where investors’ positions are highly aligned and leverage levels are quietly accumulating—these factors alone are enough to trigger a sharp decline in a single day: gold plunged over 9%, and silver tumbled about 27%.
Emily Roland, Co-Chief Investment Strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments, said: “Any asset that rises in a parabolic manner often falls in a parabolic manner as well. The recent plunge in precious metals is largely driven by market momentum, technical trading, and sentiment.”
This one-way betting phenomenon is observable across various markets. Renaissance Macro Research, citing Consensus Inc., reports that the Silver Sentiment Index, based on weekly surveys of broker strategists and financial journalists, has soared to its highest level since 1998. By Friday, the dollar had experienced its worst start to a year in eight years, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index outperformed the S&P 500 by its widest margin since 2022.
This phenomenon serves as a reminder: even though the overall bull market remains resilient, investor positioning behind it has reached an extremely high level. The gold market crash this week also exposed other crowded trades—from small-cap stocks regaining favor to strategies betting on continued low market volatility and a steepening yield curve.
On Wednesday, Microsoft (MSFT.US) announced record AI-related spending, but its core cloud business growth slowed, reigniting concerns that large tech investments may take longer to translate into actual profits. The market responded swiftly, with Microsoft’s stock price falling sharply, prompting investors to reconsider the previously widespread assumption that “high spending will solidify US tech dominance.”
Last week, tensions between the US and Europe caused market turbulence, briefly interrupting the New Year rally, but assets quickly rebounded almost in unison.
This week, the S&P 500 ended a two-week losing streak, posting its first weekly gain in three weeks, and even briefly broke the 7,000-point threshold.
Behind the market noise, a more profound question is emerging: in this momentum-driven market, do contrarian investors still have a place? Before market consensus shifts, what are the costs of going against the trend?
Rich Weiss, Chief Investment Officer of Multi-Asset Strategies at American Century Investments, was among those who started contrarian positioning at the end of last year. His portfolio increased holdings in US stocks and reduced overseas assets, but with non-US assets soaring, this move has yet to pay off.
But he remains steadfast, believing that continued growth in corporate profits will help US companies outperform their overseas competitors.
Weiss said: “Although current market trends are contrary to our positioning, the fundamentals are moving in a direction favorable to us. Chasing market momentum is like picking up coins in front of a steamroller—seems feasible until a crisis hits.”
While Friday’s market volatility has not yet fully ended all popular trades, some investors are beginning to wonder: is this an early warning sign to exit?
Jeff Muhlenkamp has closely followed the rally in gold, with his $270 million fund returning nearly 10% this year. He said that although the recent plunge in gold is not good news, exiting too early now could mean missing out on years of potential gains if prices rebound later.
He added: “I have to ask myself right now: how much more can gold fall? I don’t have an answer yet.”