As of now, the trading volume is 2250, with generated fees of 1.5gt. 1gt has been donated and 0.5gt has been burned. Some friends have suggested that adjusting the buyback and burn ratio to 50% might be a good idea. We can proceed with this approach moving forward.

View Original
post-image
post-image
嫣然天使2.0
嫣然天使2.0嫣然天使2.0
MC:$6.74KHolders:9
19.51%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
YangYeYakivip
嫣然天使2.0
0
· 1h ago
Buybacks for dividends are better. If trading volume increases and buybacks and burns continue without issuance, it doesn't constitute a complete ecosystem. The buyback dividends are randomly distributed to holders, and everyone has a chance to receive them. Moreover, dedicated community investors are more likely to benefit. This feels more like a complete ecological cycle. If holders sell, there will definitely be other buyers, and transaction fees can also be circulated and collected. Funds will flow, investors can earn returns, and public welfare is also supported.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)