Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#SECAndCFTCNewGuidelines
On March 17, 2026, the SEC and CFTC jointly ended more than a decade of regulatory ambiguity with a single 68-page document. For the first time in U.S. history, the federal government formally defined what a crypto asset is — and which agency has authority over it.
This is the most consequential regulatory event in crypto's legal history since the Howey test was first applied to digital assets. Here is what it means.
The token taxonomy: four categories.
The joint interpretive release (Release Nos. 33-11412; 34-105020) establishes a formal classification framework:
Digital commodities — native tokens of functional, decentralized networks whose value derives from protocol operation and market supply and demand, not from an issuer's promises. 16 assets were explicitly named, including BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, LINK, and DOGE. These fall under CFTC jurisdiction, not the SEC.
Digital securities — tokenized versions of traditional financial instruments: stocks, bonds, treasuries. These remain under SEC jurisdiction. RWA tokenization now has a clear legal home.
Digital collectibles — NFTs and meme coins that function as speculative collectibles. Neither the SEC nor CFTC claims jurisdiction. Meme coins are explicitly outside federal oversight under this framework.
Payment stablecoins — carved out as non-securities, providing clarity for the stablecoin sector.
The Howey test clarification — and the "separation" doctrine.
The most technically significant element of the guidance is the agencies' articulation of how a non-security token can become subject to securities law — and how it can separate from that status.
A non-security crypto asset becomes an investment contract when an issuer makes explicit representations about "essential managerial efforts" from which purchasers would reasonably expect profits. This is the standard Howey analysis.
The new element is separation: a token that was once subject to an investment contract stops being subject to securities law when the issuer either fulfills those promises, or when purchasers can no longer reasonably expect the issuer's efforts to matter to the asset's value — i.e., when the network becomes genuinely decentralized. This is the legal path by which a token that launched as a security graduates to commodity status.
On-chain activities are clarified.
The guidance explicitly addresses four activities that have existed in a legal grey zone:
Protocol mining — not an offer or sale of securities
Protocol staking — not an offer or sale of securities
Wrapping a non-security crypto asset — not a securities transaction
Airdrops — addressed within the framework; distribution mechanics matter but the act itself is not automatically a securities offering
For staking product providers, DeFi protocols, and infrastructure builders, these clarifications remove the enforcement risk that has suppressed U.S.-based development for years.
What remains unresolved.
The guidance is an interpretation — not legislation. The CLARITY Act, which would create statutory market structure law for crypto, remains stalled in the Senate Banking Committee. That matters because an interpretive release can be revised or reversed by a future administration. Market structure legislation would provide durable, statutory clarity that survives political cycles.
Additionally, the guidance narrows but does not eliminate the grey zone for tokens that sit between commodity and security status during their development phase. The "essential managerial efforts" test still requires fact-specific analysis, and litigation will continue to define its boundaries.
The political dimension.
The Guardian's reporting notes that the new framework — particularly the treatment of meme coins as digital collectibles outside federal oversight — meaningfully benefits the Trump family's crypto ventures, which span meme coin projects. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, who replaced Gary Gensler under the Trump administration, explicitly stated that "most crypto assets are not themselves securities" — a direct reversal of the Gensler-era enforcement posture.
What this means for the market.
After a decade of regulation by enforcement — where the SEC sued first and asked questions later — U.S. crypto builders, exchanges, and institutional participants now have a written framework. The immediate effects:
16 major assets have formal commodity status, reducing their securities litigation risk
RWA tokenization has a clear regulatory lane, accelerating institutional adoption
Staking, mining, and wrapping are explicitly not securities activities
Institutional capital that was sitting on the sidelines pending regulatory clarity now has a legal basis to deploy
The longer-term question is whether Congress acts to codify this framework into law before a future administration can reverse it. Until that happens, the clarity is real but conditional.
Trade the newly classified digital commodities — BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, LINK, DOGE, and more — at Gate.com.
#SECAndCFTCNewGuidelines #CryptoRegulation #Gate13thAnniversaryGlobalCelebration #GATEio