Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just came across something interesting about one of Bitcoin's earliest builders making a comeback. Martti Malmi - you know, the second developer to actually work on Bitcoin back in the day - is apparently coming back into the spotlight with some thoughts on where crypto should go next.
It's kind of wild when you think about it. Martti Malmi was there during Bitcoin's infancy, contributing to the codebase when most people didn't even know what crypto was. Then he kind of faded from the public eye for years. Now he's resurfacing with what sounds like a pretty solid vision for the space.
What makes this relevant is the timing. We're at this inflection point where crypto is either going to mature into something institutional and serious, or it keeps chasing the same patterns. Having voices like Martti Malmi weigh in - someone who actually understands the original vision and the technical foundations - that's worth paying attention to.
The thing about early Bitcoin devs is they saw the whole thing from day one. Martti Malmi wasn't just writing code, he was part of building the actual infrastructure. So when someone like that comes back with ideas about where things should evolve, it's not just another hot take - it's informed perspective.
Curious to see what Martti Malmi actually proposes. These OG builders tend to have strong opinions about keeping things aligned with first principles, but also realistic about what needs to change for adoption. That balance is rare in this space.