
A remittance letter is a written instruction or notification provided by the payer to the bank or the beneficiary, detailing key information about a payment. It helps the recipient reconcile incoming funds and properly record transactions. Importantly, the remittance letter is not the money itself, but an explanatory document outlining where the funds are coming from, where they are going, when they will arrive, and why they are being sent.
In trade, sellers use remittance letters to match incoming payments with orders. In payroll or supply chain transactions, finance teams rely on them to reconcile batch transfers. For cross-border business, remittance letters help banks and recipients in different time zones quickly confirm the path of funds. Remittance letters can be sent as emails, official letters, system notifications, or standardized certificates issued by banks.
Core elements include identification details for both payer and payee, amount and currency, date and purpose of payment, and a traceable reference number. At minimum, a remittance letter should specify: who is paying whom, how much is being paid, in which currency, when the payment occurs, and why it is being made.
Typical fields include: payer’s name and account number; recipient’s name and account number; payment amount and currency; payment date; purpose or invoice number; reference or transaction ID; fee arrangement. For cross-border transactions, additional information may be required: beneficiary bank name, SWIFT code (the international bank identifier used for cross-border messaging), beneficiary bank address, etc.
In cross-border scenarios, a remittance letter notifies the beneficiary and their bank in advance of an incoming payment, and serves as a record for matching once the funds arrive, improving deposit efficiency. It acts like both a shipment notification and a delivery receipt—providing pre-alerts and traceability.
Cross-border transfers usually transmit payment information via the SWIFT network. SWIFT is an interbank messaging system used for sending payment instructions and reconciliation data, not for transferring funds themselves. Banks generate standard messages such as MT103 (commonly used for single international transfers), which include payer and recipient details, amount, and reference number—functionally equivalent to a structured remittance letter.
Recent reports from the World Bank indicate stable growth in global cross-border remittances, with digitalization and compliance measures advancing in parallel. In this context, providing a complete remittance letter helps reduce rejections and delays caused by incomplete information.
Both documents can be used for reconciliation, but serve different purposes. A remittance letter is a proactive instruction or notification issued by the payer or generated by their system—it indicates “I intend to pay” or “I have paid.” A wire transfer receipt is generated by the bank after processing the transaction—it certifies that “the bank has handled this payment.”
In practice, recipients may first receive the remittance letter for provisional registration of the incoming payment. Once funds are credited, they use the wire transfer receipt or bank statement for final verification. Using both documents together can accelerate deposit times and reduce errors.
On-chain payments do not use traditional paper-based remittance letters but still require reconciliation information. The blockchain equivalent is the transaction hash—a unique identifier for each transaction on the network that anyone can verify on a block explorer.
For example, when paying merchants in USDT via Gate, merchants typically request both the transaction hash and payment purpose—this functions as an “on-chain remittance letter.” If your address requires a Memo or Tag (remarks needed for certain networks), this should be clearly indicated in your “remittance letter” to prevent deposit delays caused by missing notes.
Step 1: Specify identification details. Include the full name and account number of both payer and recipient. For cross-border payments, add beneficiary bank name, SWIFT code, and bank address; for eurozone payments, include IBAN (International Bank Account Number).
Step 2: State amount and currency. Clearly indicate “USD 10,000” or “CNY 50,000”—avoid listing only numbers without specifying currency.
Step 3: Provide date and purpose. State the payment date and reason, such as “payment for invoice INV-2026-001” or “milestone two project funding.”
Step 4: Add a traceable reference number. For bank wires, use the bank’s reference number; for blockchain payments, include the transaction hash; for internal company payments, add PO or order numbers for multi-layered matching.
Step 5: Provide contact details and attachments. Include contact email and phone number; attach invoices, contracts, wire receipts, or block explorer screenshots as needed to facilitate verification by the recipient.
Incomplete information is the most frequent risk—missing currency, reference number, or purpose can lead to delayed or misapplied deposits. For cross-border transactions, incorrect beneficiary bank details may cause returned payments or lengthy investigations requiring repeated communication.
On compliance: abnormal amounts or payments to sensitive countries/regions may trigger enhanced due diligence by banks. It’s recommended to provide transaction background (e.g., contract or invoice numbers) in the remittance letter and ensure names and accounts match contractual documents to reduce compliance concerns. For large or split payments, communicate routing and documentation with your bank in advance.
Fraud prevention: beware of phishing emails requesting changes to beneficiary account details. Always double-check change notifications through established channels. For financial safety, send payments only to verified accounts and carefully retain both remittance letters and receipts.
The mapping is straightforward: the “reference number” in a remittance letter corresponds to the “transaction hash” on the blockchain; “payer/payee account” matches “sender/receiver address”; “amount and currency” translates to “token quantity plus network name or contract address”; “payment date” matches “block timestamp.”
In Gate use cases—if you pay a merchant with USDT on TRON—sending them the transaction hash plus payment purpose (and linking to a block explorer) essentially covers all key elements of an “on-chain remittance letter.” If payment is sent to an exchange address requiring Memo/Tag input, explicitly confirm this field is correctly filled out in your remittance details.
The core definition of a remittance letter is: it provides identifiable, verifiable, and traceable information about a payment for reconciliation and compliance purposes. By clearly documenting identity, amount/currency, timing/purpose, and reference number across five categories, you enable efficient deposits for trade, cross-border transactions, and Web3 payments. Mapping traditional elements to on-chain transaction hashes preserves information integrity for audit/compliance while delivering transparency and speed for digital payments.
Credit remittance refers to when the sender authorizes a bank to make payment to the beneficiary on credit terms—the bank issues a remittance letter as proof. Unlike standard wire transfers (telegraphic transfers), credit remittance emphasizes formal written records backed by bank credit guarantees; recipients present the remittance letter at designated banks to claim funds—a process that is more formal and traceable.
Upon receiving a remittance letter, check five critical items: sender name/account; recipient info; amount/currency; beneficiary bank/account; expected arrival time. Any errors may result in failed deposits or frozen funds—promptly confirm with the sender upon receipt and notify your bank immediately if corrections are needed.
Remittances typically settle within 3–7 business days; time zone differences or holidays can extend this period. If overdue, first contact the sending bank to check remittance letter reference number/status; then notify your receiving bank to verify receipt; finally submit inquiries to both banks simultaneously while keeping all supporting documents for dispute resolution.
The main differences concern identification details and supporting documents. Individual remittance letters require personal ID numbers and accounts; corporate ones require business license numbers, corporate accounts, and authorized personnel information. Corporate remittances must specify business purpose (trade/services/etc.)—certain countries have additional scrutiny for corporate payments while individual transactions tend to be simpler but subject to lower limits.
Report lost remittance letters immediately to the sending bank and request cancellation to prevent fraudulent claims. If funds are frozen (usually due to risk controls or mismatched information), prepare supporting documents and submit unfreeze requests to both banks. The process may take 5–15 business days—keep all correspondence records throughout and seek legal assistance if necessary to recover funds.


