Crypto industry players are making significant moves in the U.S. political arena. Major exchanges and blockchain companies have directed substantial funding toward supporting pro-crypto political action committees, with recent disclosures showing $21 million in donations flowing into campaigns aligned with crypto-friendly policy agendas.
Gemini has emerged as a lead contributor in this wave of industry engagement, alongside other prominent platforms making coordinated financial commitments. This marks a notable shift in how the sector approaches political influence—moving from grassroots advocacy to institutional-level participation in electoral cycles.
The timing isn't coincidental. As regulatory frameworks continue to evolve and policy decisions increasingly impact cryptocurrency markets, industry heavyweights are investing directly in political infrastructure. The strategy reflects a broader calculation: that shaping policy outcomes upstream is more cost-effective than managing regulatory responses downstream.
What's interesting here isn't just the scale of funding, but the coordination signals it sends. When major exchanges align their political spending, it suggests consensus around specific policy goals—likely centered on favorable regulatory treatment, operational clarity, and market access protection.
For market participants, this development underscores a key reality: crypto's evolution from fringe asset class to mainstream financial infrastructure means its political footprint will only grow. Whether viewed as necessary industry advocacy or concerning centralization of influence, these moves are reshaping how Washington engages with digital asset policy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureAnxiety
· 01-09 07:45
With 21 million poured in, are the exchanges about to collectively go to Washington to play mahjong?
Basically, it's about forming alliances to lobby together. Looks like the SEC folks are about to be hunted down.
Gemini is leading the charge, and other platforms are following suit. Such coordinated effort... Should we retail investors also think about how to protect ourselves?
Shaping policies is definitely more satisfying than being hammered by regulations. The exchanges are calculating this very carefully.
It's unbelievable—cryptocurrency has gone from wild to mainstream so quickly... Now people are even placing bets in Congress.
With this money being spent, can't Washington take care of us a bit? Haha.
It feels like the crypto world is turning into another Wall Street interest group, which is quite unfortunate.
Big platforms are collectively donating, and retail investors can only watch...
It's all about the money. Let's leave it at that.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-09 00:34
21 million poured in, this is what they call "decentralization" haha
---
Led by Gemini to do this, other exchanges are following suit. Where are the supposed differing opinions?
---
I just want to know whose pocket this money ends up in, retail investors' hard-earned money or what?
---
Upstream shaping policies... sounds like buying rules with money, no need to pretend anymore.
---
It's a bit outrageous, coordinating to give gifts to the boss together, this is called an alliance.
---
Wait, does this mean cro们 finally realize? Reacting much faster than before.
---
That group in Washington is waiting for these 21 million, laughing so happily.
---
It's the same old trick, always remember one thing: never trust coordination.
---
From fringe to mainstream, the price is having to play politics, very realistic.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-07 00:00
2.1 million just to buy Washington? This guy's got quite the imagination, but on the other hand, someone really should spend money on lobbying.
This is what the big players are doing with political games; they should have done this a long time ago.
Seeing Gemini leading the charge, I guess it's a smart move.
The question is, will this money ultimately protect us or just protect their profits?
Washington has always been susceptible to this; maybe it can actually turn the tide.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 01-06 08:49
Wow, 210 million invested in this. This is the price of mainstream adoption... The game of power is getting serious.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 01-06 08:46
Finally, the day has come. Big players are starting to play for real. 21 million is neither too much nor too little, but this signal... the entire industry is in the same boat.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 01-06 08:45
nah this is just centralized governance wearing a libertarian costume lol. $21M to buy policy is peak irony for an industry that claims to hate intermediaries... watch how fast decentralization becomes negotiable when the stakes get real
Reply0
GasFeeLover
· 01-06 08:41
210 million invested, this is the big exchange playing games with politicians, led by Gemini? Why does it feel like the crypto space is becoming more and more like traditional finance...
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 01-06 08:38
21 million dollars for policy, this is the era we're living in, brother... money always speaks louder than technology
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 01-06 08:28
1.4 million just to buy Washington? These exchanges are really overestimating themselves, haha.
But speaking of which, the coordinated move was indeed fierce; it feels like the entire industry has finally woken up.
Gemini's follow-up was super quick; are they set on playing big?
Honestly, it's just about spending money to buy policies. It's a bit disgusting but also a reality.
If this continues, will regulators become increasingly friendly to big platforms in the future? What about small retail investors...
Are those guys at Solana also secretly investing money?
It feels a bit like concentrated power; will it turn into a monopoly with oligarchic policy dominance in the future?
By the way, is it still too late to enter now, or has this wave already been pre-determined?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-06 08:26
This is what we want, the rules for pouring money into the game
2.1 billion pouring into politics... about time it was done this way
It's Gemini again, this guy is now involved in everything
The price of mainstreaming, gotta maintain good relations with Washington folks
Capital dominates, regulators and elites all in, old tricks
Coordination signals mean they've agreed to fleece together, haha
Crypto industry players are making significant moves in the U.S. political arena. Major exchanges and blockchain companies have directed substantial funding toward supporting pro-crypto political action committees, with recent disclosures showing $21 million in donations flowing into campaigns aligned with crypto-friendly policy agendas.
Gemini has emerged as a lead contributor in this wave of industry engagement, alongside other prominent platforms making coordinated financial commitments. This marks a notable shift in how the sector approaches political influence—moving from grassroots advocacy to institutional-level participation in electoral cycles.
The timing isn't coincidental. As regulatory frameworks continue to evolve and policy decisions increasingly impact cryptocurrency markets, industry heavyweights are investing directly in political infrastructure. The strategy reflects a broader calculation: that shaping policy outcomes upstream is more cost-effective than managing regulatory responses downstream.
What's interesting here isn't just the scale of funding, but the coordination signals it sends. When major exchanges align their political spending, it suggests consensus around specific policy goals—likely centered on favorable regulatory treatment, operational clarity, and market access protection.
For market participants, this development underscores a key reality: crypto's evolution from fringe asset class to mainstream financial infrastructure means its political footprint will only grow. Whether viewed as necessary industry advocacy or concerning centralization of influence, these moves are reshaping how Washington engages with digital asset policy.