Stablecoins are essentially government debt wrapped in blockchain form. Think about it—no need to overcomplicate the mechanics.
Here's what's actually happening: governments could have deployed CBDCs directly onto public networks themselves. Instead, they took a different route. They let licensed private issuers handle the job on public blockchains. Why? Because outsourcing stablecoin issuance achieves the same monetary control objectives while offloading infrastructure risk and regulatory complexity to the private sector.
It's a strategic move. By having regulated financial institutions mint stablecoins on decentralized networks, governments get the benefits of blockchain settlement and global accessibility without directly competing with banks. The debt is still government-backed, the control remains intact—it's just distributed through intermediaries. The blockchain layer becomes the transport mechanism, but the underlying asset remains tied to traditional financial authority.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xOverleveraged
· 10h ago
Honestly, it's just the government putting on a different mask to manipulate the market. Where's the decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 10h ago
Basically, it's the government changing outfits to continue the harvest; blockchain is just a facade.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 10h ago
NGL, to put it simply, stablecoins are just a disguise for traditional finance, just a different blockchain shell.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 10h ago
Basically, the government is playing the "agent" game... It seems decentralized, but in reality, it's still being led by the nose.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 10h ago
Well said, stablecoins are just government bonds in disguise... After talking for so long, finally someone gets this point.
Stablecoins are essentially government debt wrapped in blockchain form. Think about it—no need to overcomplicate the mechanics.
Here's what's actually happening: governments could have deployed CBDCs directly onto public networks themselves. Instead, they took a different route. They let licensed private issuers handle the job on public blockchains. Why? Because outsourcing stablecoin issuance achieves the same monetary control objectives while offloading infrastructure risk and regulatory complexity to the private sector.
It's a strategic move. By having regulated financial institutions mint stablecoins on decentralized networks, governments get the benefits of blockchain settlement and global accessibility without directly competing with banks. The debt is still government-backed, the control remains intact—it's just distributed through intermediaries. The blockchain layer becomes the transport mechanism, but the underlying asset remains tied to traditional financial authority.