SEC Chair clearly promotes cryptocurrency regulatory framework, the United States may usher in a federal digital asset regulation era

On February 13, it was reported that during a Senate hearing, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Paul Atkins publicly outlined his latest stance on cryptocurrency regulation for the first time. He stated that establishing a federal-level regulatory framework for the crypto asset market in the United States is “long overdue.” This statement is seen as a significant policy signal, indicating that the U.S. is shifting from an “enforcement-first” approach to a phase of “rule-based” system development.

For years, U.S. regulation of the crypto industry has primarily relied on case-by-case enforcement, lacking unified standards, with unclear compliance pathways for companies, and frequent obstacles to capital and innovation. Atkins pointed out that this fragmented approach can no longer accommodate the current market scale, and regulators need to coordinate under a common framework rather than acting independently.

He also confirmed that the SEC and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are engaging in deep collaboration to lay the groundwork for future legislation. Since early 2026, he has been leading an inter-agency initiative called “Project Crypto,” aimed at clarifying the boundaries of digital asset classification and aligning regulatory policies with bills currently under discussion in Congress. The Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act is regarded as a key reference document; if ultimately passed, it will redefine the regulatory authority over security-type and commodity-type digital assets.

This shift has not been without resistance. Senator Elizabeth Warren publicly questioned during the hearing whether regulatory enforcement might be weakened and mentioned the potential influence of political donations on policy direction. This reflects ongoing domestic disagreements in the U.S. regarding the role of digital assets.

Nevertheless, the more significant change lies in the attitude itself. Regulatory agencies are no longer questioning whether cryptocurrencies should exist but are beginning to discuss how to incorporate them into the formal financial system. For the market, this helps reduce policy uncertainty; for institutional investors, it can lower compliance risks; and for developers, it provides clearer boundaries for innovation.

While comprehensive legislation still requires time, this statement indicates that the U.S. is moving toward a unified and predictable crypto regulatory era, which could profoundly impact the global digital asset market landscape.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Cambodian lawmakers propose severe prison time for crypto scammers

Cambodia's parliament passed legislation targeting compounds used to defraud victims through scams, including those involving cryptocurrency. In a Friday notice, the Senate of the Kingdom of Cambodia announced that the chamber had unanimously approved the draft law with no amendment, with 58

Cointelegraph59m ago

Nevada judge extends ban on Kalshi, rejects event contract defense

A Nevada judge has reportedly extended a ban preventing Kalshi from offering event-based contracts in the state, ruling that the products constitute unlicensed gambling under state law. Judge Jason Woodbury said at a hearing in Carson City on Friday that he will grant a preliminary injunction

Cointelegraph8h ago

Prediction: the market platform will accelerate its expansion in Asia; regulatory gray areas are the biggest challenge for further growth

Polymarket and PredicXion are expanding into Asian markets and launching Chinese-language support to drive localization. However, countries such as China and India lack clear regulation for blockchain prediction markets, and there are strict restrictions on gambling activities, which affects market expansion. The difference between prediction markets and gambling is their ability to aggregate information.

GateNews10h ago

Polymarket takes down market on missing US pilot after backlash

Polymarket removed a market tied to the fate of a missing US service member after mounting backlash, saying the listing violated its “integrity standards.” The controversy erupted after a prediction market appeared asking whether US authorities would confirm the rescue of a pilot reportedly shot

Cointelegraph12h ago

A prediction market platform delisted a “Missing U.S. military aviator” prediction market, saying it violated integrity standards.

A prediction market platform removed markets about the fate of a missing American pilot for violating the “integrity standards,” triggering controversy. U.S. House lawmakers criticized such betting as “disgusting” and questioned rule transparency. Meanwhile, concerns about insider trading have intensified, and regulators are calling for stronger restriction measures.

GateNews12h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments