-
Sam Bankman-Fried says new testimony shows FTX assets exceeded deposits despite liquidity gap.
-
Former data chief Dan Chapsky claimed customers could have been repaid within months.
-
SBF seeks retrial in Manhattan, alleging new evidence and prosecutorial pressure.
Sam Bankman-Fried renewed claims this week that FTX remained solvent during its November 2022 collapse, citing new sworn testimony. Posting through a proxy on X, the former CEO referenced a declaration from a senior former executive. The move comes as Bankman-Fried, now imprisoned, pursues a new trial in Manhattan federal court.
Sworn Declaration From Former FTX Data Chief
According to Sam Bankman-Fried, the most qualified person to assess FTX’s finances was Dan Chapsky. Chapsky served as head of data science at FTX and later worked with bankruptcy attorneys. Notably, those lawyers hired him to calculate whether the exchange was solvent.
In his sworn declaration, Chapsky stated that FTX International faced an $8 billion liquidity gap on November 11, 2022. However, he wrote that assets still exceeded customer deposits. Based on asset values at the time, he concluded the exchange remained solvent despite liquidity stress. He added that customers could have been repaid within months, not years, absent an omnibus bankruptcy.
Solvency Claims and Bankruptcy Findings
Bankman-Fried said Chapsky’s conclusions align with findings from the bankruptcy court’s independent examiner. He argued that the shutdown prevented faster customer recoveries. Meanwhile, he emphasized that liquidity shortfalls differ from insolvency under standard financial definitions.
However, the exchange entered bankruptcy proceedings shortly after withdrawals halted. The declaration focuses on asset coverage, not operational continuity. Chapsky framed his analysis around asset ownership and estimated recovery timelines.
New Trial Effort and Legal Challenges
Bankman-Fried is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud tied to FTX’s collapse. He recently filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial. The filing was submitted in Manhattan federal court and supported by his mother, Barbara Fried.
The motion argues that new witness evidence could weaken the prosecution’s case. It highlights the absence of testimony from former FTX executive Ryan Salame. Salame later faced federal convictions after separate proceedings.
Bankman-Fried also alleged prosecutorial misconduct, claiming witnesses faced pressure from the Department of Justice. He asked Judge Lewis Kaplan to recuse himself. However, appellate judges have questioned whether solvency was central to the original verdict.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SEC and CFTC Establish Crypto Taxonomy With Five Key Categories
U.S. regulators established a framework to classify digital assets into five groups, enhancing jurisdiction clarity. This includes commodities overseen by the CFTC and securities by the SEC, with special treatment for stablecoins and utility tokens based on usage.
CryptoFrontNews6m ago
Husband accuses wife of stealing over 2,000 bitcoins! Judge: The plaintiff has a very high chance of winning.
The UK High Court recently heard a Bitcoin theft case in which plaintiff Ping Fai Yuen accused his separated wife Fun Yung Li of stealing Bitcoin from his hardware wallet through secret surveillance, valued at approximately $176 million. Audio recordings and search warrant evidence supported the plaintiff's claims. The court maintained the asset freeze order but rejected certain claims. The judge found the plaintiff had an extremely high likelihood of success and recommended expediting the trial date.
区块客6m ago
US Senator Proposes Ban on Prediction Markets, Sports Betting, and Casino-Style Games
On March 23rd, two U.S. senators plan to introduce legislation to prohibit prediction market platforms from listing contracts related to sports events, arguing that these markets infringe on consumer rights and tribal sovereignty, and requiring state governments to regulate gambling activities that could potentially lead to youth addiction. This move could reshape the regulatory landscape for sports betting and prediction markets.
GateNews55m ago
SBF's "Prison Letter" Sent from Silicon Valley FedEx Demanding Retrial: Prison Name Written Incorrectly, Prosecutors Discover Someone Ghostwrote It
Federal prosecutors have questioned the authenticity of a retrial request letter allegedly sent by SBF from prison, citing three red flags: the letter's improper use of FedEx, incorrect identification of the detention facility, and improper signature formatting. These issues have challenged the letter's credibility, and SBF's appeal has been rejected by the court, which emphasized that the nature of the fraud does not change due to subsequent restitution. Overall, SBF's defense coordination system appears to have experienced procedural failures.
動區BlockTempo1h ago
Crypto Fraudsters Targeted Vizagites, Duped them of ₹35 lakhs
A group of Vizagites lost over ₹35 lakh in a crypto scam, lured by fraudsters promising high returns. Victims were approached through social media, and withdrawal requests were blocked after initial gains. Authorities are investigating under the IT Act.
TheNewsCrypto1h ago
U.S. Prosecutors Question Authenticity of SBF's Appeal Request Letter, Citing Mismatch Between Sender Address and His Prison Location
US prosecutors questioned the authenticity of an appeal letter sent by FTX founder SBF from prison, pointing out that its mailing address does not match the prison facility and violates relevant regulations. Although prosecutors did not directly accuse SBF of forgery, the inconsistencies in the letter have undermined the credibility of his request for a new trial. SBF was sentenced to 25 years for fraud and is seeking a retrial.
GateNews1h ago
